On 2/15/23 13:37, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:39:16PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/9/23 09:39, Marek Polacek wrote:
In constexpr-nsdmi3.C, with -fno-elide-constructors, we don't elide
the Y::Y(const Y&) call used to initialize o.c. So store_init_value
-> cxx_constant_in
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:39:16PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/9/23 09:39, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > In constexpr-nsdmi3.C, with -fno-elide-constructors, we don't elide
> > the Y::Y(const Y&) call used to initialize o.c. So store_init_value
> > -> cxx_constant_init must constexpr-evaluate th
On 2/9/23 09:39, Marek Polacek wrote:
In constexpr-nsdmi3.C, with -fno-elide-constructors, we don't elide
the Y::Y(const Y&) call used to initialize o.c. So store_init_value
-> cxx_constant_init must constexpr-evaluate the call to Y::Y(const Y&)
in cxx_eval_call_expression. It's a trivial funct
In constexpr-nsdmi3.C, with -fno-elide-constructors, we don't elide
the Y::Y(const Y&) call used to initialize o.c. So store_init_value
-> cxx_constant_init must constexpr-evaluate the call to Y::Y(const Y&)
in cxx_eval_call_expression. It's a trivial function, so we do the
"Shortcut trivial cons
