On 1/19/21 5:38 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:47:47PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 1/13/21 6:39 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
r11-6301 added some asserts in mangle.c, and now we trip over one of
them. In particular, it's the one asserting that we didn't get
I
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:47:47PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 1/13/21 6:39 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > r11-6301 added some asserts in mangle.c, and now we trip over one of
> > them. In particular, it's the one asserting that we didn't get
> > IDENTIFIER_ANY_OP_P when manglin
On 1/13/21 6:39 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
r11-6301 added some asserts in mangle.c, and now we trip over one of
them. In particular, it's the one asserting that we didn't get
IDENTIFIER_ANY_OP_P when mangling an expression with a dependent name.
As this testcase shows, it's possible to get that,
r11-6301 added some asserts in mangle.c, and now we trip over one of
them. In particular, it's the one asserting that we didn't get
IDENTIFIER_ANY_OP_P when mangling an expression with a dependent name.
As this testcase shows, it's possible to get that, so turn the assert
into an if and write "on
