On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/25/21 1:37 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > In-Reply-To: <20210225063712.3725111-1-ppa...@redhat.com>
>
> BTW, This patch doesn't seem in any way a reply to your previous patch, so
> it's confusing for the mail headers (and thus MUA threading) to say t
On 2/25/21 1:37 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
In-Reply-To: <20210225063712.3725111-1-ppa...@redhat.com>
BTW, This patch doesn't seem in any way a reply to your previous patch,
so it's confusing for the mail headers (and thus MUA threading) to say
that it is. Maybe you want git send-email --no-thr
In the three-parameter version of satisfy_declaration_constraints, when
't' isn't the most general template, then 't' doesn't correspond with
the augmented template arguments 'args', and so the instantiation
context that we push via push_tinst_level isn't quite correct. This
manifests as misleadin
