Re: [PATCH] c++: -Wuninitialized when binding a ref to uninit DM [PR113987]

On 2/22/24 14:28, Marek Polacek wrote: On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:34:45AM +, Jason Merrill wrote: On 2/20/24 19:15, Marek Polacek wrote: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- This PR asks that our -Wuninitialized for mem-initializers does not warn when bindi

Re: [PATCH] c++: -Wuninitialized when binding a ref to uninit DM [PR113987]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:34:45AM +, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 2/20/24 19:15, Marek Polacek wrote: > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? > > > > -- >8 -- > > This PR asks that our -Wuninitialized for mem-initializers does > > not warn when binding a reference to an

Re: [PATCH] c++: -Wuninitialized when binding a ref to uninit DM [PR113987]

On 2/20/24 19:15, Marek Polacek wrote: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- This PR asks that our -Wuninitialized for mem-initializers does not warn when binding a reference to an uninitialized data member. We already check !INDIRECT_TYPE_P in find_uninit_fields_

[PATCH] c++: -Wuninitialized when binding a ref to uninit DM [PR113987]

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- This PR asks that our -Wuninitialized for mem-initializers does not warn when binding a reference to an uninitialized data member. We already check !INDIRECT_TYPE_P in find_uninit_fields_r, but that won't catch binding a paramet