On 4/18/19 9:59 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Sebor writes:
On 4/18/19 6:07 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I th
Martin Sebor writes:
> On 4/18/19 6:07 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
>>> On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
The
On 4/18/19 6:07 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
The tests for the fix have been failing with
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 14:08, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
> > On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
> >> with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
> >> The tests for t
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
> On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
>> with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
>> The tests for the fix have been failing with an ICE on aarch64
>> because it suffer
On 18/04/2019 09:58, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
>> with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
>> The tests for the fix have been failing with an ICE on aarch64
>>
On 18/04/2019 03:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
> with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
> The tests for the fix have been failing with an ICE on aarch64
> because it suffers from more or less the same problem but i
The fix for pr89797 committed in r270326 was limited to targets
with NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS == 1 which I think is all but aarch64.
The tests for the fix have been failing with an ICE on aarch64
because it suffers from more or less the same problem but in
its own target-specific code. Attached is the
