Re: [PING][PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-03-21 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 3/20/21 10:48 AM, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: On 3/18/2021 4:18 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564483.html The review of this patch digressed into a design discussion of a new, more capable implementation of -Wstrict-

Re: [PING][PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-03-20 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 3/18/2021 4:18 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564483.html The review of this patch digressed into a design discussion of a new, more capable implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing, but the proposed patch turning just this on

[PING][PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-03-18 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564483.html The review of this patch digressed into a design discussion of a new, more capable implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing, but the proposed patch turning just this one instance of -Warray-bounds into -Wstrict-aliasing and makin

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-12 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:26 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 2/11/21 1:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > >> > >> On 2/10/21 3:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 2/9/21 12:41 AM

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-11 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 2/11/21 1:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/10/21 3:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/9/21 12:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:04 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-11 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 2/10/21 3:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > >> > >> On 2/9/21 12:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:04 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches > >>> wrote: > > >>>

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-10 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 2/10/21 3:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/9/21 12:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:04 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/3/21

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-10 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 2/9/21 12:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:04 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > >> > >> On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 2/3/21 2:57

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-09 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 2/8/21 4:26 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 2/8/21 4:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses who

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-09 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 2/9/21 12:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:04 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds e

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-08 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:04 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > >> On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhanceme

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-08 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 2/8/21 4:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> >> On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: >>> On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose >

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-08 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 2/8/21 12:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has been causi

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-08 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 2/3/21 3:45 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> >> On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: >>> The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose >>> leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has >>> been causing some confusion. 

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-03 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 2/3/21 2:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has been causing some confusion.  When the warning is issued for an access to an in-bounds me

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-02-03 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 1/28/21 4:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose > leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has > been causing some confusion.  When the warning is issued for > an access to an in-bounds member via a pointer to a struc

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-01-31 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 1/30/21 12:36 AM, Eric Gallager wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:04 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has been causing some confusion. When the warning is issu

Re: [PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-01-29 Thread Eric Gallager via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:04 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose > leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has > been causing some confusion. When the warning is issued for > an access to an in-bounds mem

[PATCH] adjust "partly out of bounds" warning (PR 98503)

2021-01-28 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
The GCC 11 -Warray-bounds enhancement to diagnose accesses whose leading offset is in bounds but whose trailing offset is not has been causing some confusion. When the warning is issued for an access to an in-bounds member via a pointer to a struct that's larger than the pointed-to object, phrasi