On 3/26/24 12:26, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Victor Do Nascimento writes:
Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions
by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of
Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the
`+lse128' target archit
On Mär 15 2024, Victor Do Nascimento wrote:
> \ No newline at end of file
Please fix that.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Victor Do Nascimento writes:
> Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions
> by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of
> Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the
> `+lse128' target architecture compile-time flag is absent fro
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 12:15, Victor Do Nascimento
wrote:
>
> Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions
> by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of
> Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the
> `+lse128' target architecture
Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions
by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of
Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the
`+lse128' target architecture compile-time flag is absent from GCC.
This, however, contrasts with
