On 27/06/2024 22:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 20:25, François Dumont wrote:
Thanks for the link, based on it I removed some of the nullptr usages
keeping only assignments.
That's not necessary. A nullable pointer type is equality comparable
with nullptr_t, and nullptr can
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 20:25, François Dumont wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link, based on it I removed some of the nullptr usages
> keeping only assignments.
That's not necessary. A nullable pointer type is equality comparable
with nullptr_t, and nullptr can be implicitly converted to the pointer
ty
Thanks for the link, based on it I removed some of the nullptr usages
keeping only assignments.
François
On 26/06/2024 23:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 21:39, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is my proposal to add support for fancy allocator pointer.
The only place where
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 21:39, François Dumont wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Here is my proposal to add support for fancy allocator pointer.
>
> The only place where we still have C pointers is at the
> iterator::pointer level but it's consistent with std::list
> implementation and also logical considering tha
Hi
Here is my proposal to add support for fancy allocator pointer.
The only place where we still have C pointers is at the
iterator::pointer level but it's consistent with std::list
implementation and also logical considering that we do not get
value_type pointers from the allocator.
I also
