On 02/01/2013 12:42 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
If this data could be emitted in a
declarative fashion, it might be possible to emit it by default, in a
separate ELF section. This way, it is always there when needed, and it
wouldn't have any performance impact if not used.
That might be possible;
cmt...@google.com
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 09:07 PM, Caroline Tice wrote:
>>
>> We have been developing a new security hardening feature for GCC that
>> is designed to detect and handle (during program execution) when a
>> vtable pointer that is abou
On 11/01/2012 09:07 PM, Caroline Tice wrote:
We have been developing a new security hardening feature for GCC that
is designed to detect and handle (during program execution) when a
vtable pointer that is about to be used for a virtual function call is
not a valid vtable pointer for that call (i.
Can you split the patch into two parts? One for runtime and and one
for GCC ? Please also use -up option in the diff command to generate
the patch file.
thanks,
David
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Caroline Tice wrote:
> We have been developing a new security hardening feature for GCC that
> i
