On 10/3/18 6:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/3/18 3:57 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 10/3/18 11:07 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi.
There's one another ICE when calling fn_summary->get for a node
that's not present. Back-trace is:
(gdb) bt
#0 inline_to_all_callers (node
On 10/3/18 3:57 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/3/18 11:07 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> There's one another ICE when calling fn_summary->get for a node
>>> that's not present. Back-trace is:
>>>
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0 inline_to_all_callers (node=>> "*.LTHUNK0"/2>, data=0x7fffd690) at
>
On 10/3/18 11:07 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> There's one another ICE when calling fn_summary->get for a node
>> that's not present. Back-trace is:
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 inline_to_all_callers (node=> "*.LTHUNK0"/2>, data=0x7fffd690) at
>> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-inline.c:22
> Hi.
>
> There's one another ICE when calling fn_summary->get for a node
> that's not present. Back-trace is:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 inline_to_all_callers (node=,
> data=0x7fffd690) at /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-inline.c:2260
> #1 0x00b0b2c1 in cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_an
Hi.
There's one another ICE when calling fn_summary->get for a node
that's not present. Back-trace is:
(gdb) bt
#0 inline_to_all_callers (node=,
data=0x7fffd690) at /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-inline.c:2260
#1 0x00b0b2c1 in cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_and_aliases
(includ