Re: [PATCH] Update libgcc.texi to match implementation in libgcc/libgcc2.c

2014-12-09 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2014-12-09 23:08 GMT+08:00 Ian Lance Taylor : > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Kito Cheng wrote: >> >> This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit >> operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed >> integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make

Re: [PATCH] Update libgcc.texi to match implementation in libgcc/libgcc2.c

2014-12-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Kito Cheng wrote: > > This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit > operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed > integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make sense :) > > ChangeLog > 2014-10-28 Kito Cheng >

Re: [PATCH] Update libgcc.texi to match implementation in libgcc/libgcc2.c

2014-11-04 Thread Kito Cheng
ping! On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Kito Cheng wrote: > Hi all: > > This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit > operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed > integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make sense :) > > ChangeLog > 2014-10-

[PATCH] Update libgcc.texi to match implementation in libgcc/libgcc2.c

2014-10-27 Thread Kito Cheng
: [PATCH] Update libgcc.texi to match implementation in libgcc/libgcc2.c 2014-10-28 Kito Cheng * doc/libgcc.texi: Update text to match implementation in libgcc/libgcc2.c --- gcc/doc/libgcc.texi | 28 ++-- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git