2014-12-09 23:08 GMT+08:00 Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
>>
>> This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit
>> operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed
>> integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit
> operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed
> integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make sense :)
>
> ChangeLog
> 2014-10-28 Kito Cheng
>
ping!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit
> operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed
> integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make sense :)
>
> ChangeLog
> 2014-10-
: [PATCH] Update libgcc.texi to match implementation in
libgcc/libgcc2.c
2014-10-28 Kito Cheng
* doc/libgcc.texi: Update text to match implementation in
libgcc/libgcc2.c
---
gcc/doc/libgcc.texi | 28 ++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git