On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 03:35 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On 11/29/2015 06:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this safe for stage 3?
>>
>>
>> Is there a reason to do it now? This doesn't include a testcase.
>
> Handling the proposed attribute requires exte
On 11/30/2015 03:35 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 11/29/2015 06:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this safe for stage 3?
Is there a reason to do it now? This doesn't include a testcase.
Handling the proposed attribute requires extensions to the current
function_arg capabilities.
I need to go back to t
On 11/29/2015 06:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this safe for stage 3?
Is there a reason to do it now? This doesn't include a testcase.
* function.c (assign_parm_setup_stack): Force source into a
register if needed.
* target.def (function_incoming_arg): Update documentation
On x86, interrupt handlers are only called by processors which push
interrupt data onto stack at the address where the normal return address
is. Since interrupt handlers must access interrupt data via pointers so
that they can update interrupt data, the pointer argument is passed as
"argument poin