On 2/10/22 23:48, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches writes:
The -Warray-bounds description in the manual is out of date in
a couple of ways. First it claims that the option is only active
with optimization, which isn't entirely correct since at least one
instance is issued
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches writes:
> The -Warray-bounds description in the manual is out of date in
> a couple of ways. First it claims that the option is only active
> with optimization, which isn't entirely correct since at least one
> instance is issued even without it. Second, the descript
The -Warray-bounds description in the manual is out of date in
a couple of ways. First it claims that the option is only active
with optimization, which isn't entirely correct since at least one
instance is issued even without it. Second, the description of
its level 2 suggests it controls the w
