On Tue, 27 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > * tree-vrp.c
> > > (vrp_evaluate_conditional_warnv_with_ops_using_ranges):
> > > Try using literal operands when comparing
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > * tree-vrp.c (vrp_evaluate_conditional_warnv_with_ops_using_ranges):
> > Try using literal operands when comparing value-ranges failed.
>
> No test case?
Sorry ;) Happens to
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> * tree-vrp.c (vrp_evaluate_conditional_warnv_with_ops_using_ranges):
> Try using literal operands when comparing value-ranges failed.
No test case?
Ciao!
Steven
Especially for ops with symbolic ranges it may be preferable
to compare one range with an op such as in
[x + 1, x + 1] < x instead of expanding the range of x on
the rhs to sth unrelated.
So, try harder.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-27 Richard
