On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:20:37AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > 2017-02-27 Jakub Jelinek
> >
> > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Use
> > cond ? G_("...") : G_("...") instead of just cond ? "..." : "...".
> > * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_goacc_validate_dims):
On 27/02/17 18:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:47:09PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_O
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Yes, it's generally the case that G_() is used whenever there's a
> > conditional expression for the msgid argument to a diagnostic function.
>
> So, is this ok for trunk? Shall I regenerate gcc.pot or will you?
OK. I'll regenerate gcc.pot in a fe
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:47:09PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> > > > This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
> > > > pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (outer_nelts, i
On 27 Feb, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> So here's the second attempt:
>>
>> 2017-02-27 Volker Reichelt
>>
>> * init.c: Include intl.h.
>> (build_new_1): Move message strings into pedwarn to make them
>> -Wformat-secur
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> So here's the second attempt:
>
> 2017-02-27 Volker Reichelt
>
> * init.c: Include intl.h.
> (build_new_1): Move message strings into pedwarn to make them
> -Wformat-security friendly. Mark string for translat
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> > > This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
> > > pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (outer_nelts, input_location), OPT_Wvla,
> > > typedef_variant_p (orig_type)
> >
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> > This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
> > pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (outer_nelts, input_location), OPT_Wvla,
> >typedef_variant_p (orig_type)
> >? "non-constant array new lengt
On 26 Feb, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:18:57PM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> 2017-02-26 Volker Reichelt
>>
>> * init.c: Include intl.h
>
> Missing .
Indeed, I noticed that one after I hit the send button.
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #include "varasm.h"
>> #include
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:18:57PM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> 2017-02-26 Volker Reichelt
>
> * init.c: Include intl.h
Missing .
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include "varasm.h"
> #include "gimplify.h"
> #include "c-family/c-ubsan.h"
> +#include "intl.h"
>
> static bool begin_init_st
After Jakub's and Marek's latest translation patches, I grepped for
other unmarked messages. Here's what I found in the C++ front-end.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
Regards,
Volker
2017-02-26 Volker Reichelt
* init.c: Include intl.h
(build_new_1): Mar
11 matches
Mail list logo