> Hi.
>
> In order to fix the warnings mentioned in the PR, we need
> to run remove_unreachable_nodes after early tree passes. That's
> however possible only within a IPA pass. Thus I'm calling that
> before the profile PASS.
>
> Patch survives regression tests on ppc64le-linux-gnu and majority
>
>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-11-08 Martin Liska
>>>>>
>>>>> * tree-profile.c: Run TODO_remove_functions before "profile"
>>>>> pass in order to remove dead functions that will trigger
>>>>>
On 11/8/18 12:46 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:39 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/8/18 12:19 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In order to fix the warnings mentioned in the PR, we need
> to run remove_unreachable_nodes after early tree passes. That's
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:39 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 11/8/18 12:19 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >> Hi.
> > >>
> > >> In order to fix the warnings mentioned in the PR, we need
> > >> to run remove_unreachable_nodes after early tree passes. That's
> > >> however possible only within a IPA
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:39 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/8/18 12:19 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> In order to fix the warnings mentioned in the PR, we need
> >> to run remove_unreachable_nodes after early tree passes. That's
> >> however possible only within a IPA pass. Thus I'm c
On 11/8/18 12:19 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> In order to fix the warnings mentioned in the PR, we need
>> to run remove_unreachable_nodes after early tree passes. That's
>> however possible only within a IPA pass. Thus I'm calling that
>> before the profile PASS.
>>
>> Patch survives regres
Hi.
In order to fix the warnings mentioned in the PR, we need
to run remove_unreachable_nodes after early tree passes. That's
however possible only within a IPA pass. Thus I'm calling that
before the profile PASS.
Patch survives regression tests on ppc64le-linux-gnu and majority
of warnings are g
