On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 9:13 AM Cassio Neri wrote:
>
> I could not find any entry in gcc's bugzilla for that. Perhaps my search
> wasn't good enough.
I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR112395 with a first attempt at the patch
(will double check it soon).
Thanks,
Andrew
>
>
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 15
I could not find any entry in gcc's bugzilla for that. Perhaps my search
wasn't good enough.
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 15:58, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2023, Cassio Neri wrote:
>
> > When year_month_day_last::day() was implemented, Dr. Matthias Kretz
> realised
> > that the operation "& 1"
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023, Cassio Neri wrote:
When year_month_day_last::day() was implemented, Dr. Matthias Kretz realised
that the operation "& 1" wasn't necessary but we did not patch it at that
time. This patch removes the unnecessary operation.
Is there an entry in gcc's bugzilla about having the
When year_month_day_last::day() was implemented, Dr. Matthias Kretz realised
that the operation "& 1" wasn't necessary but we did not patch it at that
time. This patch removes the unnecessary operation.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/chrono
b/