Re: [PING][PATCH] Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause

2016-04-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:32:34AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > Patch updated as attached. > > OK for stage4/stage1 trunk? Ok for stage4, thanks. > Remove incorrect warning for parallel implicit firstprivate clause > > 2016-03-24 Tom de Vries > > * omp-low.c (lower_omp_target): Set TR

Re: [PING][PATCH] Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause

2016-04-08 Thread Tom de Vries
On 05/04/16 17:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:17:16PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: On 24/03/16 18:02, Tom de Vries wrote: Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause 2016-03-24 Tom de Vries * omp-low.c (lower_omp_target): Set TREE_NO_WARNING for oac

Re: [PING][PATCH] Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause

2016-04-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:17:16PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 24/03/16 18:02, Tom de Vries wrote: > >Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause > > > >2016-03-24 Tom de Vries > > > > * omp-low.c (lower_omp_target): Set TREE_NO_WARNING for oacc > > firstprivate clause.

[PING][PATCH] Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause

2016-04-05 Thread Tom de Vries
On 24/03/16 18:02, Tom de Vries wrote: Hi, This patch fixes an incorrect warning for the oacc firstprivate clause. Consider this test-case: ... void foo (void) { int i; #pragma acc parallel { i = 1; } } ... When compiling with -fopenacc -Wuninitialized, we get an 'is used unini

[PATCH] Remove incorrect warning for parallel firstprivate clause

2016-03-24 Thread Tom de Vries
Hi, This patch fixes an incorrect warning for the oacc firstprivate clause. Consider this test-case: ... void foo (void) { int i; #pragma acc parallel { i = 1; } } ... When compiling with -fopenacc -Wuninitialized, we get an 'is used uninitialized' warning for variable 'i', which i