I have corrected the ChangeLog format, and committed this patch.
Thank you!
Cong
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Cong Hou wrote:
>> The current GCC vectorizer requires the following pattern as a simple
>> reduction computation:
>>
>>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Cong Hou wrote:
> The current GCC vectorizer requires the following pattern as a simple
> reduction computation:
>
>loop_header:
> a1 = phi < a0, a2 >
> a3 = ...
> a2 = operation (a3, a1)
>
> But a3 can also be defined outside of the loop. For ex
Ping...
thanks,
Cong
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Cong Hou wrote:
> Ping.. Any comment on this patch?
>
>
> thanks,
> Cong
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> You can also add a test case of this form:
>>
>> int foo( int t, int n, int *dst)
>> {
>>int j
Ping.. Any comment on this patch?
thanks,
Cong
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> You can also add a test case of this form:
>
> int foo( int t, int n, int *dst)
> {
>int j = 0;
>int s = 1;
>t++;
>for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
> {
> dst[j] = t;
You can also add a test case of this form:
int foo( int t, int n, int *dst)
{
int j = 0;
int s = 1;
t++;
for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
{
dst[j] = t;
s *= t;
}
return s;
}
where without the fix the loop vectorization is missed.
David
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at
The current GCC vectorizer requires the following pattern as a simple
reduction computation:
loop_header:
a1 = phi < a0, a2 >
a3 = ...
a2 = operation (a3, a1)
But a3 can also be defined outside of the loop. For example, the
following loop can benefit from vectorization but the G
