Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-pr65935.c for RVV

2023-10-10 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: > Here is the reference comparing dump IR between ARM SVE and RVV. > > https://godbolt.org/z/zqess8Gss > > We can see RVV has one more dump IR: > optimized: basic block part vectorized using 128 byte vectors > since RVV has 1024 bit vectors. > > The codeg

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-pr65935.c for RVV

2023-10-10 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Great ! I am gonna wait for Richi's approval. juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Andrew Stubbs Date: 2023-10-10 17:40 To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org CC: rguent...@suse.de; jeffreya...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-pr65935.c for RVV On 10/10/2023

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-pr65935.c for RVV

2023-10-10 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 10/10/2023 02:39, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: Here is the reference comparing dump IR between ARM SVE and RVV. https://godbolt.org/z/zqess8Gss We can see RVV has one more dump IR: optimized: basic block part vectorized using 128 byte vectors since RVV has 1024 bit vectors. The codegen is reasonable

[PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-pr65935.c for RVV

2023-10-09 Thread Juzhe-Zhong
Here is the reference comparing dump IR between ARM SVE and RVV. https://godbolt.org/z/zqess8Gss We can see RVV has one more dump IR: optimized: basic block part vectorized using 128 byte vectors since RVV has 1024 bit vectors. The codegen is reasonable good. However, I saw GCN also has 1024 bi