On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 02:24, Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> I am not sure if I am missing something, your testcase should rely on
> movmisalignhi pattern, but you defined movmisalign with ANYF
> mode iterator rather than movmisalign with HI, SI, DI?
It was already defined with the ANYI iterator in the p
I am not sure if I am missing something, your testcase should rely on
movmisalignhi pattern, but you defined movmisalign with ANYF
mode iterator rather than movmisalign with HI, SI, DI?
And seems the testcase compile with `-march=rv64gc -mabi=lp64
-mtune=size -O2` w/o this patch already generated
The default implementation of support_vector_misalignment() checks
whether movmisalign is present for the requested mode. This
will be used by vect_supportable_dr_alignment() to determine whether a
misaligned access of vectorized data is permissible.
For RISC-V this is required to convert multipl