> Hi Jin,
>
> this looks reasonable. Would you mind adding (small) test cases
> still to make sure we don't accidentally reintroduce the problem?
>
> Regards
> Robin
Ok, I have already sent the v2 version, please review it again, thanks.
Link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-Ju
Hi Jin,
this looks reasonable. Would you mind adding (small) test cases
still to make sure we don't accidentally reintroduce the problem?
Regards
Robin
The pattern mistakenly believes that fsflags can use immediate numbers,
but in fact it does not support it. Immediate numbers should use fsflagsi.
For example:
__builtin_riscv_fsflags(4);
The following error occurred:
/tmp/ccoWdWqT.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccoWdWqT.s:14: Error: illegal operand
