10:10
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix incorrect code of touching inaccessible memory
address
I am a little hesitant about that, since I feel the vl and normal op
should be put in separately, otherwise the means of m_op_num
I am a little hesitant about that, since I feel the vl and normal op
should be put in separately, otherwise the means of m_op_num is kind
of unclear, we have comments there but I think it's not ideal since it
is really context sensitive and hard to determine.
And I suspect gcc_assert (ops[m_op_num
From: Juzhe-Zhong
For VLMAX situation, rtx len = ops[m_op_num] is incorrect since
the last element the ops array should be ops[m_op_num - 1];
I notice this issue when I am debugging code.
This is a code bug even though the following codes will hide this issue.
We still should need this minor fix
