Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix pr109479 RVV ISA inconsistency bug

Thanks for the quick response! verified and pushed to trunk. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:56 PM wrote: > > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong > > Fix supporting data type according to RVV ISA. > For vint64m*_t, we should only allow them in zve64* instead of zve32*_zvl64b > (>=64b). > Ideally, we should make error

[PATCH] RISC-V: Fix pr109479 RVV ISA inconsistency bug

From: Ju-Zhe Zhong Fix supporting data type according to RVV ISA. For vint64m*_t, we should only allow them in zve64* instead of zve32*_zvl64b (>=64b). Ideally, we should make error message more friendly like Clang. https://godbolt.org/z/f9GMv4dMo to report the RVV type require extenstion name.

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix PR109479

OK for trunk, but plz improve the coverage of the testcase, e.g. vint16mf4_t has fixed too but not tested in testcase. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:09 PM wrote: > > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong > > Fix supporting data type according to RVV ISA. > For vint64m*_t, we should only allow them in zve64* instead of

[PATCH] RISC-V: Fix PR109479

From: Ju-Zhe Zhong Fix supporting data type according to RVV ISA. For vint64m*_t, we should only allow them in zve64* instead of zve32*_zvl64b (>=64b). Ideally, we should make error message more friendly like Clang. https://godbolt.org/z/f9GMv4dMo to report the RVV type require extenstion name.