: [PATCH] RISC-V: Early expand DImode vec_duplicate in RV32
system
I would prefer to add a dedicated test case to test that, so that we
could also cover that even if we didn't enable multi-lib testing for
RV32, and I suppose that should only require compile test for part of
that test case ?
On Mon
heng
> Date: 2023-11-06 20:38
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Early expand DImode vec_duplicate in RV32 system
> Could you add a testcase? other than that LGTM.
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:27 PM Juzhe-Zh
___
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-11-06 20:38
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Early expand DImode vec_duplicate in RV32 system
> Could you add a t
: 2023-11-06 20:38
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Early expand DImode vec_duplicate in RV32 system
Could you add a testcase? other than that LGTM.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:27 PM Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
>
> An ICE was discovered in
Could you add a testcase? other than that LGTM.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:27 PM Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
>
> An ICE was discovered in recent rounding autovec support:
>
> config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:4314
>65 | }
> | ^
> 0x1fa5223 riscv_vector::validate_change_or_fail(rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> rtx_def
An ICE was discovered in recent rounding autovec support:
config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:4314
65 | }
| ^
0x1fa5223 riscv_vector::validate_change_or_fail(rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
rtx_def*, bool)
/home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:431
