On 2/12/25 7:03 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Hi,
in PR118832 we have another instance of the problem already noticed in
PR117878. We sometimes use e.g. expand_simple_binop for vector
operations like shift or and. While this is usually OK, it causes
problems when doing it late, e.g. during LRA.
In
LGTM
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2025-02-12 22:03
To: gcc-patches
CC: pal...@dabbelt.com; kito.ch...@gmail.com; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai;
jeffreya...@gmail.com; pan2...@intel.com; rdapp@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Avoid more unsplit insns in const expander [PR118832
Hi,
in PR118832 we have another instance of the problem already noticed in
PR117878. We sometimes use e.g. expand_simple_binop for vector
operations like shift or and. While this is usually OK, it causes
problems when doing it late, e.g. during LRA.
In particular, we might rematerialize a const
