On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 11:43 PM Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/6/24 13:40, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> > The combiner attempts to optimize a zero-extension of a logical right shift
> > using zero_extract. We already utilize this optimization for those cases
> > that result in a single instruction
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 11:24 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/6/24 2:40 PM, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> > The combiner attempts to optimize a zero-extension of a logical right shift
> > using zero_extract. We already utilize this optimization for those cases
> > that result in a single instructions.
On 5/6/24 3:42 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 5/6/24 13:40, Christoph Müllner wrote:
The combiner attempts to optimize a zero-extension of a logical right shift
using zero_extract. We already utilize this optimization for those cases
that result in a single instructions. Let's add a insn_and_s
On 5/6/24 13:40, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> The combiner attempts to optimize a zero-extension of a logical right shift
> using zero_extract. We already utilize this optimization for those cases
> that result in a single instructions. Let's add a insn_and_split
> pattern that also matches the g
On 5/6/24 2:40 PM, Christoph Müllner wrote:
The combiner attempts to optimize a zero-extension of a logical right shift
using zero_extract. We already utilize this optimization for those cases
that result in a single instructions. Let's add a insn_and_split
pattern that also matches the gener
The combiner attempts to optimize a zero-extension of a logical right shift
using zero_extract. We already utilize this optimization for those cases
that result in a single instructions. Let's add a insn_and_split
pattern that also matches the generic case, where we can emit an
optimized sequence
