Jelinek
> Date: 2023-02-16 18:20
> To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vm* mask C api tests
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:53:48PM +0800, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> > Thanks for reporting this.
rivai.ai
From: Jakub Jelinek
Date: 2023-02-16 18:20
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vm* mask C api tests
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:53:48PM +0800, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this. I think may be we can
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:53:48PM +0800, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this. I think may be we can make reduce tests into 1/3.
> For example:
> We have:
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/vmand_mm-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/vmand_mm-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/r
uzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; Jeff Law
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vm* mask C api tests
Hi!
I see in the past few weeks you've added huge amounts of these tests
du -shc *.target/riscv/*/
34M gcc.target/riscv/rvv/
28M g++.target/riscv/rvv/
61M total
and new are coming (nothing
Hi!
I see in the past few weeks you've added huge amounts of these tests
du -shc *.target/riscv/*/
34M gcc.target/riscv/rvv/
28M g++.target/riscv/rvv/
61M total
and new are coming (nothing at all at this year's start).
This is far larger than tests of any other architecture
(i386 has 3
