On Thu, 10 Feb 2022, Kito Cheng wrote:
> OK for release branches, thanks!
Backported to GCC 11 & 10 then; not needed for GCC 9.
Maciej
Hi Maciej:
OK for release branches, thanks!
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:24 PM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> > OK to trunk, thanks for fixing this issue, I hit that issue before but
> > I didn't figure out what happened...since that issue will disappear
> > w
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Kito Cheng wrote:
> OK to trunk, thanks for fixing this issue, I hit that issue before but
> I didn't figure out what happened...since that issue will disappear
> when I clean build :p
Committed to trunk now, thanks for you review.
How about release branches?
Maciej
OK to trunk, thanks for fixing this issue, I hit that issue before but
I didn't figure out what happened...since that issue will disappear
when I clean build :p
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 5:52 AM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> Make riscv-sr.o depend on target machine headers, removing spurious test
> f
Make riscv-sr.o depend on target machine headers, removing spurious test
failures:
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/save-restore-3.c scan-assembler-not call[
\t]*t0,__riscv_save_0
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/save-restore-3.c scan-assembler-not tail[
\t]*__riscv_restore_0
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/save-restore-3.c