On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 09:55:02 PDT (-0700), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/9/24 10:52 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:43:13 PDT (-0700), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/7/24 11:33 PM, Tsung Chun Lin wrote:
That M implies Zmmul.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/confi
On 10/9/24 10:52 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:43:13 PDT (-0700), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/7/24 11:33 PM, Tsung Chun Lin wrote:
That M implies Zmmul.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: M implies Zmmul.
THanks. I've pushed this to
On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:43:13 PDT (-0700), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/7/24 11:33 PM, Tsung Chun Lin wrote:
That M implies Zmmul.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: M implies Zmmul.
THanks. I've pushed this to the trunk.
jeff
ps. Quite a discussion on t
On 10/7/24 11:33 PM, Tsung Chun Lin wrote:
That M implies Zmmul.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: M implies Zmmul.
THanks. I've pushed this to the trunk.
jeff
ps. Quite a discussion on this topic in the zmmul public discussion
from a couple years ago. But
0001-RISC-V-Add-implication-for-M-extension.patch
Description: Binary data
