Re: [PATCH] RFC: Interix resurrection

2012-01-22 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 01/22/2012 10:16 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote: May I regenerate libiberty/configure and check it in, or does that require a libiberty maintainer? Yes, regenerate everything that is affected. Paolo

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Interix resurrection

2012-01-22 Thread Douglas Rupp
On 1/22/2012 4:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 01/01/2012 10:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote: -i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*) +i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*) # Interix 3.x gcc -fpic/-fPIC options generate broken code. # Instead, we relocate shared libraries at runtime. ;; Is thi

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Interix resurrection

2012-01-22 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > Ping. > Patch retested with 1/18/2012 sources. > >> On 1/1/2012 1:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote: >> >>This is for 32bit, "C" language only. >>Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux > Build parts are ok. Looking at the patch, I didn't spotted anything obviously wrong

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Interix resurrection

2012-01-22 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 01/01/2012 10:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote: -i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*) +i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*) # Interix 3.x gcc -fpic/-fPIC options generate broken code. # Instead, we relocate shared libraries at runtime. ;; Is this still true? Build parts are ok. Pa

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Interix resurrection

2012-01-21 Thread Douglas Rupp
Ping. Patch retested with 1/18/2012 sources. On 1/1/2012 1:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote: This is for 32bit, "C" language only. Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux --Doug

[PATCH] RFC: Interix resurrection

2012-01-01 Thread Douglas Rupp
This is for 32bit, "C" language only. Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux --Doug 2012-01-01 Douglas B Rupp /config/mh-interix: Remove as unneeded. /config/picflag.m4 (i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*): Change triplet to i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*.