On 04/11/15 09:45, Jiong Wang wrote:
> As discussed at the bugzilla
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305
>
> neon_vector_mem_operand is broken. As the comments says
> "/* Reject eliminable registers. */", the code block at the head
> of this function which checks eliminabl
On 04/11/15 09:45, Jiong Wang wrote:
As discussed at the bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305
neon_vector_mem_operand is broken. As the comments says
"/* Reject eliminable registers. */", the code block at the head
of this function which checks eliminable registers i
On 11/04/2015 01:45 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
> So as Jim Wilson commented on the bugzilla, instead of "return !strict",
> we need to only do the check if strict be true, and only does rejection
> which means return FALSE, for all other cases, we need to go through
> those normal checks below.
I was j
As discussed at the bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305
neon_vector_mem_operand is broken. As the comments says
"/* Reject eliminable registers. */", the code block at the head
of this function which checks eliminable registers is designed to do
early reject only, the
