Re: [PATCH] PR66669: Fix failure of gcc.dg/loop-8.c on Power (Backport)

2017-06-26 Thread Kelvin Nilsen
Is it ok to backport this patch to GCC-6? On 01/23/2017 09:59 AM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > > The test gcc.dg/loop-8.c makes assumptions that are not valid on Power > architecture (and on certain other architectures for which this issue > has already been addressed). The test case assumes that a s

Re: [PATCH] PR66669: Fix failure of gcc.dg/loop-8.c on Power

2017-01-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/23/2017 09:59 AM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: The test gcc.dg/loop-8.c makes assumptions that are not valid on Power architecture (and on certain other architectures for which this issue has already been addressed). The test case assumes that a single loop-invariant statement will be moved outsi

[PATCH] PR66669: Fix failure of gcc.dg/loop-8.c on Power

2017-01-23 Thread Kelvin Nilsen
The test gcc.dg/loop-8.c makes assumptions that are not valid on Power architecture (and on certain other architectures for which this issue has already been addressed). The test case assumes that a single loop-invariant statement will be moved outside the loop. On Power, a constant is copy-prop