On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 4:42 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
>
> On 5/3/25 07:41, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 12:39 AM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >> On trunk I'll eventually do something different.. but it will be more
> >> invasive than I think is reasonable for a backport.
> >>
> >>
On 5/3/25 07:41, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 12:39 AM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On trunk I'll eventually do something different.. but it will be more
invasive than I think is reasonable for a backport.
The problem in the PR is that there is a variable with a range and has a
bitm
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 12:39 AM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On trunk I'll eventually do something different.. but it will be more
> invasive than I think is reasonable for a backport.
>
> The problem in the PR is that there is a variable with a range and has a
> bitmask attached to it. We often de
On trunk I'll eventually do something different.. but it will be more
invasive than I think is reasonable for a backport.
The problem in the PR is that there is a variable with a range and has a
bitmask attached to it. We often defer bitmask processing, the the
change which triggers this pro
