On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:28:03AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:53:07PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Ping patch for PR target/102059 to ignore implicit -mpower8-fusion that
> > prevents a function targeting power9 or power10 from inlining a function
> > that
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:53:07PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Ping patch for PR target/102059 to ignore implicit -mpower8-fusion that
> prevents a function targeting power9 or power10 from inlining a function that
> declared it needed power8 via attribute/pragma target.
Can we just disable a
the specific problem Eigen ran into. It will need to be back
ported to GCC 11 and 10 as well.
| Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 22:27:11 -0500
| From: Michael Meissner
| Subject: [PATCH] PR target/102059 Fix inline of target specific functions
| Message-ID:
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 04:56:13PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> on 2022/2/9 上午11:27, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Reset -mpower8-fusion for power9 inlining power8 functions, PR 102059.
> >
> > This patch is an attempt to make a much simpler patch to fix PR
> > target/
Hi Michael,
on 2022/2/9 上午11:27, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Reset -mpower8-fusion for power9 inlining power8 functions, PR 102059.
>
> This patch is an attempt to make a much simpler patch to fix PR target/102059
> than the previous patch.
>
> It just fixes the issue that if a fun
Reset -mpower8-fusion for power9 inlining power8 functions, PR 102059.
This patch is an attempt to make a much simpler patch to fix PR target/102059
than the previous patch.
It just fixes the issue that if a function is specifically declared as a power8
function, you can't inline in functions tha
