On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:17 PM, VandeVondele Joost
> wrote:
>> In some cases (e.g. coverage testing) it is useful to emit code for static
>> functions even if they are never used, which currently is not possible at
>> -O1 and above. The
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:17 PM, VandeVondele Joost
wrote:
> In some cases (e.g. coverage testing) it is useful to emit code for static
> functions even if they are never used, which currently is not possible at -O1
> and above. The following patch introduces a flag for this, which basically
>
In some cases (e.g. coverage testing) it is useful to emit code for static
functions even if they are never used, which currently is not possible at -O1
and above. The following patch introduces a flag for this, which basically
triggers the same code that keeps those functions alive at -O0. Than
