Hi Steve,
>> Just my usual request for a meaningful test-case name: This one could
>> be class_result_4.f90. (I don't want to be pedantic about this, but in
>> a growing testsuite of 4000+ files, I really think it makes sense to
>> have meaningful names. It does have various advantages and, to be
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit?
>
> the patch is certainly ok.
>
> Just my usual request for a meaningful test-case name: This one could
> be class_result_4.f90. (I don't want to be pedantic about
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:56:02 +0100
Janus Weil wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit?
>
> the patch is certainly ok.
>
> Just my usual request for a meaningful test-case name: This one could
> be class_result_4.f90. (I don't want to be pedantic about
Hi Steve,
> Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit?
the patch is certainly ok.
Just my usual request for a meaningful test-case name: This one could
be class_result_4.f90. (I don't want to be pedantic about this, but in
a growing testsuite of 4000+ files, I really think it makes se
Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit?
2016-11-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78500
* expr.c (gfc_check_vardef_contextm): YANPD
* interface.c (matching_typebound_op): Ditto.
2016-11-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78500
* gfortran.dg/pr7
