subject:"\[PATCH\] PR 53975"

Re: [PATCH] PR 53975

2012-10-16 Thread Andrey Belevantsev

Hello, On 31.07.2012 15:08, Andrey Belevantsev wrote: Hello, This PR is about wrong speculation of an insn that doesn't support storing NaT bits done by the selective scheduler (more details in the PR audit trail). The reason for this is the wrong one-liner patch committed last year, the fix i

[PATCH] PR 53975

2012-07-31 Thread Andrey Belevantsev

Hello, This PR is about wrong speculation of an insn that doesn't support storing NaT bits done by the selective scheduler (more details in the PR audit trail). The reason for this is the wrong one-liner patch committed last year, the fix is to revert that patch and to clarify the comment bef