Re: [PATCH] Move some Cilk+ code around

2015-10-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/20/2015 10:17 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: The function is_cilkplus_vector_p is defined both in c-parser.c and parser.c and is exactly the same so it seems that it should rather be defined in the common Cilk+ code (even though for such a small static inline fn it probably doesn't matter much).

[PATCH] Move some Cilk+ code around

2015-10-20 Thread Marek Polacek
The function is_cilkplus_vector_p is defined both in c-parser.c and parser.c and is exactly the same so it seems that it should rather be defined in the common Cilk+ code (even though for such a small static inline fn it probably doesn't matter much). While at it, fix some typos and simplify the c