On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:13 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:05:42AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > * Makefile.in: Add filedescriptor.c.
> > > * filedescriptor.c: New file.
> > > * lrealpath.c (is_valid_fd): Remove.
> >
> >
> > I don't understan
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:05:42AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > * Makefile.in: Add filedescriptor.c.
> > * filedescriptor.c: New file.
> > * lrealpath.c (is_valid_fd): Remove.
>
>
> I don't understand the dup2 fallback. It looks backward: if dup2(fd,
> fd) will retu
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:15 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> As Jakub correctly noted, I used a piggy backing to put the new function
> to a file that is supposed to contain different functions. So that
> I'm suggesting a new file. Moreover, I'm also adding dup2 fallback.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86
Hi.
As Jakub correctly noted, I used a piggy backing to put the new function
to a file that is supposed to contain different functions. So that
I'm suggesting a new file. Moreover, I'm also adding dup2 fallback.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be i
