> I agree. I don't have a preference for which is better, but being consistent
> with other documentation might be a winning argument.
Pushed as attached.
FX
0001-Libquadmath-update-doc-for-some-constants.patch
Description: Binary data
On 8/27/24 11:06, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi FX,
FX Coudert wrote:
Give it’s a doc patch, I think it might fall under the obvious rule,
and will commit in a week if there is no objection.
The patch clearly fixes a bug in the current specification and is fine,
I just wonder …
* libquadmath.te
Hi FX,
FX Coudert wrote:
Give it’s a doc patch, I think it might fall under the obvious rule, and will
commit in a week if there is no objection.
The patch clearly fixes a bug in the current specification and is fine,
I just wonder …
* libquadmath.texi (M_LOG2Eq, M_LOG10Eq, M_2_PIq): Fix
kind ping
Give it’s a doc patch, I think it might fall under the obvious rule, and will
commit in a week if there is no objection.
FX
> As reported by Peter Randall, the description of three constants in
> libquadmath is wrong. Attached patch fixes them.
>
> OK to push?
>
> FX
>
>
> libquad
As reported by Peter Randall, the description of three constants in libquadmath
is wrong. Attached patch fixes them.
OK to push?
FX
libquadmath/ChangeLog:
* libquadmath.texi (M_LOG2Eq, M_LOG10Eq, M_2_PIq): Fix
description of these constants.
0001-Libquadmath-update-doc-for
