Re: [PING 3] [PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023, Martin Uecker via Gcc-patches wrote: > Joseph, I would appreciate if you could take a look at this? > > This fixes the remaining issues which requires me to turn the > warnings off with -Wno-vla-parameter and -Wno-nonnull in my > projects. The front-end changes are OK. --

[PING 3] [PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

Joseph, I would appreciate if you could take a look at this? This fixes the remaining issues which requires me to turn the warnings off with -Wno-vla-parameter and -Wno-nonnull in my projects. Am Montag, dem 03.04.2023 um 21:34 +0200 schrieb Martin Uecker: > > With the relatively new warning

[PING 2] [PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

Ok for gcc-14 now? Am Dienstag, dem 04.04.2023 um 19:31 -0600 schrieb Jeff Law: > > > On 4/3/23 13:34, Martin Uecker via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > > > With the relatively new warnings (11..) affecting VLA bounds, > > I now get a lot of false positives with -Wall. In general, I find > > th

Re: [PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

Am Dienstag, dem 04.04.2023 um 19:31 -0600 schrieb Jeff Law: > > On 4/3/23 13:34, Martin Uecker via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > > > With the relatively new warnings (11..) affecting VLA bounds, > > I now get a lot of false positives with -Wall. In general, I find > > the new warnings very useful,

Re: [PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

Am Dienstag, dem 04.04.2023 um 19:31 -0600 schrieb Jeff Law: > > On 4/3/23 13:34, Martin Uecker via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > > > With the relatively new warnings (11..) affecting VLA bounds, > > I now get a lot of false positives with -Wall. In general, I find > > the new warnings very useful,

Re: [PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

On 4/3/23 13:34, Martin Uecker via Gcc-patches wrote: With the relatively new warnings (11..) affecting VLA bounds, I now get a lot of false positives with -Wall. In general, I find the new warnings very useful, but they seem a bit too aggressive and some minor tweaks are needed, otherwise t

[PATCH] Less warnings for parameters declared as arrays [PR98541, PR98536]

With the relatively new warnings (11..) affecting VLA bounds, I now get a lot of false positives with -Wall. In general, I find the new warnings very useful, but they seem a bit too aggressive and some minor tweaks are needed, otherwise they are too noisy. This patch suggests two changes: 1. F