On 10/17/19 2:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 05:14:48PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:25:01PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 2019-03-15 2:30 p.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote:
PR89721 shows LRA treating an unspec_volatile's result as inva
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 05:14:48PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:25:01PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > On 2019-03-15 2:30 p.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >PR89721 shows LRA treating an unspec_volatile's result as invariant,
> > >which of course isn't correct
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:25:01PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 2019-03-15 2:30 p.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >PR89721 shows LRA treating an unspec_volatile's result as invariant,
> >which of course isn't correct. This patch fixes it.
> Segher, thank you for fixing this. The patch
On 2019-03-15 2:30 p.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote:
PR89721 shows LRA treating an unspec_volatile's result as invariant,
which of course isn't correct. This patch fixes it.
Segher, thank you for fixing this. The patch is ok to commit.
Question. Is side_effects_p the correct check? Or do we
PR89721 shows LRA treating an unspec_volatile's result as invariant,
which of course isn't correct. This patch fixes it.
Question. Is side_effects_p the correct check? Or do we want to
allow PRE_INC etc. here? What about CALL?
Segher
2019-04-15 Segher Boessenkool
PR rtl-optimiz
