Re: [PATCH] LFS support for libbacktrace

2017-06-27 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/20/2017 05:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > >> >> This fixes the [f]open use in libgfortran. Doesn't fix the ones >> in libsanitizer because those appearantly use a copy because they >> need to rename stuff... >> >> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_6

Re: [PATCH] LFS support for libbacktrace

2017-06-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor via gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > This fixes the [f]open use in libgfortran. Doesn't fix the ones > in libsanitizer because those appearantly use a copy because they > need to rename stuff... > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk > and bran

Re: [PATCH] LFS support for libbacktrace

2017-06-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > > This fixes the [f]open use in libgfortran. Doesn't fix the ones > in libsanitizer because those appearantly use a copy because they > need to rename stuff... > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk > and branches? Pin

[PATCH] LFS support for libbacktrace

2017-06-14 Thread Richard Biener
This fixes the [f]open use in libgfortran. Doesn't fix the ones in libsanitizer because those appearantly use a copy because they need to rename stuff... Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk and branches? Thanks, Richard. 2017-06-14 Richard Biener * con