Re: [PATCH] Introduce gcc::dump_manager class

2013-10-14 Thread David Malcolm
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 12:13 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 3:31 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > > When repeatedly compiling within one process, the dumpfile numbering > > doesn't reset, leading to dumpfiles after the initial ones having > > unpredictable numbers like here (-fdum

Re: [PATCH] Introduce gcc::dump_manager class

2013-10-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 3:31 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > When repeatedly compiling within one process, the dumpfile numbering > doesn't reset, leading to dumpfiles after the initial ones having > unpredictable numbers like here (-fdump-tree-all at -O0): > > fake.c.000i.cgraph > fake.c.0

[PATCH] Introduce gcc::dump_manager class

2013-10-11 Thread David Malcolm
When repeatedly compiling within one process, the dumpfile numbering doesn't reset, leading to dumpfiles after the initial ones having unpredictable numbers like here (-fdump-tree-all at -O0): fake.c.000i.cgraph fake.c.004t.gimple fake.c.1477t.omplower fake.c.1478t.lowe