I haven't yet but I will try and sort it out tomorrow.
If we're replacing the current method with one that takes a size
parameter when _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI is defined, is this going to
cause any issues with ABI compatibility? If not, then I agree that we
should go with the #if version.
On 10 Oc
On 09/10/16 16:23 +0100, Elliot Goodrich wrote:
Hi,
If we unroll the loop so that we iterate both forwards and backwards,
we can take advantage of memory-level parallelism when chasing
pointers. This means that reverse takes 35% less time when nodes are
randomly scattered in memory and about the
Hi,
If we unroll the loop so that we iterate both forwards and backwards,
we can take advantage of memory-level parallelism when chasing
pointers. This means that reverse takes 35% less time when nodes are
randomly scattered in memory and about the same time if nodes are
contiguous.
Further, as o
