On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> It looks like IPA ICF does code generation based on the order of
> a hahstable walk which is keyed on pointers. That's a no-no.
> Fixing that doesn't solve the cc1 miscompare for LTO bootstrap
> but at least the IPA ICF WPA dumps are now consistent
It looks like IPA ICF does code generation based on the order of
a hahstable walk which is keyed on pointers. That's a no-no.
Fixing that doesn't solve the cc1 miscompare for LTO bootstrap
but at least the IPA ICF WPA dumps are now consistent between
stages.
[LTO] Bootstrapped and tested on x86
