Re: [PATCH] IBM zSystems: Fix function_ok_for_sibcall [PR106355]

2022-10-18 Thread Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
On 8/17/22 13:50, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > For a parameter with BLKmode we cannot use REG_NREGS in order to > determine the number of consecutive registers. Streamlined this with > the implementation of s390_function_arg. > > Fix some indentation whitespace, too. > > Assuming bootstr

Re: [PATCH] IBM zSystems: Fix function_ok_for_sibcall [PR106355]

2022-08-24 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 01:50:45PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > For a parameter with BLKmode we cannot use REG_NREGS in order to > determine the number of consecutive registers. Streamlined this with > the implementation of s390_function_arg. > > Fix some indentation whitespace, to

Re: [PATCH] IBM zSystems: Fix function_ok_for_sibcall [PR106355]

2022-08-17 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:57 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: > > For a parameter with BLKmode we cannot use REG_NREGS in order to > determine the number of consecutive registers. Streamlined this with > the implementation of s390_function_arg. > > Fix some indentation whites

[PATCH] IBM zSystems: Fix function_ok_for_sibcall [PR106355]

2022-08-17 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
For a parameter with BLKmode we cannot use REG_NREGS in order to determine the number of consecutive registers. Streamlined this with the implementation of s390_function_arg. Fix some indentation whitespace, too. Assuming bootstrap and regtest are ok for mainline and gcc-{10,11,12}, ok to instal