Am 03.02.25 um 19:31 schrieb Jerry D:
On 2/3/25 2:49 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Steve Kargl writes:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Am 01.02.25 um 21:03 schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
the attached patch d
On 2/3/25 2:49 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Steve Kargl writes:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Am 01.02.25 um 21:03 schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
the attached patch downgrades different constant character
Steve Kargl writes:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>> Am 01.02.25 um 21:03 schrieb Steve Kargl:
>> > On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>> > >
>> > > the attached patch downgrades different constant character lengths in an
>> > > array
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Am 01.02.25 um 21:03 schrieb Steve Kargl:
> > On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> > >
> > > the attached patch downgrades different constant character lengths in an
> > > array constructor from a GNU to a
Am 01.02.25 um 21:49 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
So why must we be so tough?
Here's what I get from other compilers:
Intel, Nvidia, AMD flang: silent by default.
ifx -stand f18:
char_array_constructor_5.f90(11): warning #8208: If type specification
is omitted, each ac-value expression in the arr
Am 01.02.25 um 21:03 schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
the attached patch downgrades different constant character lengths in an
array constructor from a GNU to a legacy extension, so that users get a
warning with -std=gnu. We continue to genera
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> the attached patch downgrades different constant character lengths in an
> array constructor from a GNU to a legacy extension, so that users get a
> warning with -std=gnu. We continue to generate an error when standard
> conforman
On 2/1/25 10:25 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear all,
the attached patch downgrades different constant character lengths in an
array constructor from a GNU to a legacy extension, so that users get a
warning with -std=gnu. We continue to generate an error when standard
conformance is requested.
Re
testcase where this
triggered... :)
OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
From c2ab5fc3e4cc758ca00e1878394c8f1466462f84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 19:14:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: different character lengths in array constructor
[PR93289]
PR fortran
