On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 4:01 PM Michael Meissner wrote:
>
> [PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
>
> I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
> of the tests. If the test was run with optimization, the optimizer could
> delete some of the tests
On 7/12/21 12:11 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:49:26AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 7/7/21 3:00 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
[PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
of the tests. If
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:49:26AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 7/7/21 3:00 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> >[PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
> >
> >I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
> >of the
Hi Mike,
On 7/7/21 3:00 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
[PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
of the tests. If the test was run with optimization, the optimizer could
delete some of the tests and throw off the count
[PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
of the tests. If the test was run with optimization, the optimizer could
delete some of the tests and throw off the count. However, due to the
fact that the value being loaded in
Ping patch again.
Original patch (Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test)
| Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:49:58 -0400
| Subject: [PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
| Message-ID: <20210518204958.ga17...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org>
| https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570684.html
N
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 02:31:59PM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 16:49 -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > [PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
> >
>
> hi,
>
>
> > I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
&
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 16:49 -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> [PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
>
hi,
> I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
> of the tests. If the test was run with optimization, the optimizer could
> delete some of the
[PATCH] Fix vec-splati-runnable.c test.
I noticed that the vec-splati-runnable.c did not have an abort after one
of the tests. If the test was run with optimization, the optimizer could
delete some of the tests and throw off the count.
I have bootstraped this on LE power9 and BE power8 systems
